Recent contributions on the areas of focus
-
Contribution by: S Michaels
Comment by: S Michaels Focus area: Appeals Regulator concerned: Trading Standards (Local Authority) Comment: I am a Trading Standards Officer – my job regularly involves giving advice to businesses that … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: John Shattock
Comment by: John Shattock Focus area: Childcare Regulator concerned: Environmental Heath (Local Authority),Health and Safety Executive (HSE),OFSTED Comment: We are an organisation with 216 locations in over 100 different local … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: Sarah Beene
Comment by: Sarah Beene Focus area: Childcare Regulator concerned: Planning ( Local Authority) Comment: We are an organisation with 216 locations with over 100 different local authority areas. Following several … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: Helena Meineck
Comment by: Helena Meineck Focus area: Childcare Regulator concerned: OFSTED Comment: Two years ago I had my first Ofsted inspection. It was a fast and furious inspection lasting only one … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: Helena Meineck
Comment by: Helena Meineck Focus area: Childcare Regulator concerned: Local Authority or Fire Authority Comment: Local Authority Early Years and Childcare Services/ Early Years Advisors. I would like to know … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: Tracy Pitman
Comment by: Tracy Pitman Focus area: Childcare Regulator concerned: OFSTED Comment: As a manager of a rural Pre-School undertaking the Early Years foundation degree (part time and hoping to start … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: Jo Martin
Comment by: Jo Martin Focus area: Childcare Regulator concerned: OFSTED Comment: I am a local authority worker supporting childminders. The government criticise LAs for asking childcare providers to undertake work … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: stacey green
Comment by: stacey green Focus area: Childcare Regulator concerned: OFSTED Comment: Starting off with Registration I had a very good experience of registering with Ofsted. This was in part due … Continue reading →
-
Contribution by: S Michaels
-
Respond to this Cancel reply
Follow new comments on this item by RSS
Contribution by Louise Beaton
Comment by: Louise Beaton
Focus area: Volunteer events
Regulator concerned: Intellectual Property Office (IPO)
Comment:
The requirement to hold a PRS and/or PPL licence for events that include public performance of copyright music is a nuisance and sometimes results in double charging. PRS claim they only licence premises, not individuals, but volunteer run premises such as village halls that are only occasionally used for public events with music cannot afford to have an annual licence if they do not need it (charges can be £hundreds). Hall trustees want to put the responsibility for getting a licence on hirers that need it, through their hiring agreement. However, one village hall which did this ended up devising extra forms for hirers to complete, because PRS were so “hawkish” about the fact that it was a legal requirement for the premises to have a licence they felt they needed belt and braces to cover themselves against legal action by PRS. While one understands the need for copyright fees this is not “life and death” like health and safety, and regulation should therefore be proportionate: It should be accepted by PRS that those halls or other premises that do not usually need a licence should be allowed to simply put in a hiring agreement that it is up to the hirer to obtain one. If a hirer fails to do so, PRS should be required to seek the fee due from the hirer, not the organisation running the premises. Such “legal threats” put people off volunteering as trustees. Double payment should also be avoided, for example festivals should not pay fees on income from events held at premises already holding a licence. Community premises that do hold licences should pay fees that relate to public use of music, not “defined income”, which is irrelevant. It would therefore be helpful if PRS offered “books of permits” for halls – eg halls with occasional music events should be able to buy a book of, say, 5 permits at a slightly reduced price and use them up when needed, which could be over a period of years, before buying a new one. That would save administration for PRS and halls and event organisers.